The failure mode in legal research is a confident answer with no source, and the profession has already had public embarrassments from exactly that. Grounding the answer in the matter's documents and returning citations makes it checkable; being able to pull the full opinion means the citation can be verified rather than trusted. Note that the tool list varies by plan, so what you see may be fewer than five.
Ezel's endpoint for their legal AI. Five tools, and the tool set you actually see is filtered by your plan and feature switches — case law needs that capability enabled.
- ezel_list_matters — your matters
- ezel_ask_matter — an answer drawn from that matter's documents, with citations
- ezel_ask — general legal question-answering with research
- ezel_search_caselaw — ranked US case-law search
- ezel_get_case — the full opinion text
OAuth for a custom connector, or a bearer key from Settings. A paid plan is required, and storage is described as encrypted and per-workspace, with API keys stored only as hashes.
Paste a URL, then authorize — add the endpoint to your client, then approve the OAuth consent screen