Employee monitoring plus an AI query interface is a combination that deserves suspicion, so what they publish matters: the connection serves the derived record only and never the raw capture, no screenshots or video are stored, raw screen data is deleted during processing, keystrokes are never read, personal activity is skipped in real time, and an entry an employee redacts is erased and cannot surface here at all. Queries are permission-scoped by role. That is a considered design rather than a disclaimer. Whether the underlying product belongs in your workplace is still a management decision, not a technical one — but the redaction switch belonging to the employee is the detail that would change my answer.
ScreenJournal watches screen activity and turns it into a work record. The endpoint queries that record: what the team worked on, where the hours went, how something was done. It does not expose the capture itself.
Querying the team's work record, drafting standups, generating reports, preparing timesheets and delivering summaries. No tool list is published; queries are scoped by role permissions.
- A company-authorised client — the endpoint is per account and configured inside the app
- The desktop applications do the capture; the record is what the connection reads
- A free trial is offered; no public pricing page