The fund index and the bot positions are simulated, which makes them a signal about the fleet's behaviour rather than a track record. Used that way, bot consensus is genuinely interesting: a fast read on how a crowd of automated strategies is leaning, useful precisely as something to argue with. Used the other way — as evidence a strategy makes money — it is misleading, and no MCP connection is a basis for a trade. The scope split is right: paper writes and portfolio writes are separately grantable, so you can let an agent rehearse without letting it near a real position.
Trading Wizard runs a fleet of AI trading bots and publishes what they collectively think. The market intelligence answers unauthenticated; account actions need scoped authorisation.
- Prices and lists — live price for stocks, crypto, forex, futures and indices, browsable market lists, and a macro market summary
- get_market_track — price spikes, regime changes and AI calls scored by significance
- get_market_movers — verified public statements from people who move markets
- get_bot_consensus and get_global_bots — how the public bot fleet is biased on a symbol, with confidence and trade-likelihood
- get_ranked_opportunities — the live scanner board ranked by trade-likelihood
- get_fund_performance and get_bot_one_status — a paper-performance index and one bot's public paper position
Nothing for the public read-only market intelligence. Account data requires OAuth, with separate scopes for reading, paper-trading writes and portfolio writes.
Paste a URL, then authorize — add the endpoint to your client, then approve the OAuth consent screen