
box-legal-workflows-intake
★ 5by box · part of box/box-for-ai
Automate legal client intake and onboarding with Box MCP — review intake documents for completeness against firm requirements, summarize risk for attorney review, route incomplete or high-risk submissions to the right attorney, extract client and matter metadata to Box, and generate engagement letters from Box DocGen templates. Use this skill when the user mentions client intake, client onboarding, new client review, intake documents, or engagement letters.
This is the playbook your agent receives when the skill activates — you don't need to read it to use the skill, but it's here to audit before installing.
Client Intake & Onboarding
PREREQUISITES:
- Read
box:boxfor Box MCP auth, tool selection, base workflows. If missing, run:npx skills add https://github.com/box/box-for-ai --skill box- Read
box-legal-workflowsfor Box collaboration role definitions, Box AI usage boundaries, and reusable confirmation phrasings. If missing, run:npx skills add box/box-for-ai --skill box-legal-workflows
Do client intake in Box: inventory the intake folder, check completeness with Box AI against the firm's checklist, extract intake data into Box metadata, route via comments and collaborations, and generate the engagement letter with Box DocGen. This skill is the intake-specific recipe; the underlying Box tool mechanics live in the capability references below. The firm supplies the required-document checklist and risk criteria; conflict, PEP, and sanctions determinations run through the firm's screening system — not the agent or Box AI. Not legal advice.
Box capability references
Reach for these for tool mechanics rather than restating them here:
box:references/content-workflows.md— inventory the folder, metadata templates,set_file_metadata, file commentsbox:references/ai-and-retrieval.md— completeness checks and data extraction; pacing, limits, citationsbox:references/mcp-doc-gen.md— generate the engagement letter from a templatebox:references/collaboration.md— tag/route the attorney and share with the clientbox:references/mcp-search.md— find/inspect the firm's metadata template
Box metadata model
Record the intake outcome as file metadata so submissions stay searchable. Find/create the firm's template via box:references/mcp-search.md / box:references/content-workflows.md.
- Representative fields (confirm the firm's actual set):
client_name,matter_name,practice_area,matter_owner,jurisdiction,matter_value,intake_status(complete/incomplete),risk_rating,assigned_attorney,decision,decision_date. - Store the firm/attorney's rating and decision, not the agent's.
Tool selection
| Intake task | Tool | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory submission | list_folder_content_by_folder_id | All files in the intake folder |
| Check completeness | ai_qa_multi_file | Present/complete/valid vs. firm checklist, with citations |
| Extract intake data | ai_extract_structured_from_fields_enhanced | Client, matter, jurisdiction, value |
| Write metadata | set_file_metadata | Record status, rating, decision, attorney |
| Tag attorney | create_file_comment | Route with the factual summary |
| Grant access | create_collaboration | Give the attorney access |
| Generate engagement letter | create_docgen_batch | Only if the firm approves |
| Share with client | add_folder_shared_link or create_collaboration | Confirm audience/expiration |
Workflow
- Inventory:
list_folder_content_by_folder_id. [CONFIRM: intake folder ID] - Completeness:
ai_qa_multi_file— is each required doc (per the firm's checklist) present, complete, and valid, with citations? [CONFIRM: firm's required-document list] - Extract intake data:
ai_extract_structured_from_fields_enhanced(client_name, matter_name, practice_area, jurisdiction, matter_value, …). - Surface risk indicators (facts only):
ai_qa_multi_fileto surface the facts the firm's criteria reference (value, jurisdiction, named parties) with citations. Do not use AI to determine conflicts, PEP status, or sanctions — pass names/entities/locations to the firm's screening system. - Persist:
set_file_metadatawith the firm-confirmedrisk_rating,intake_status, anddecision. - Route:
create_file_commentto tag the attorney with the factual summary;create_collaborationfor access. [CONFIRM: who, access level] - Engagement letter (only if the firm approves):
create_docgen_batchagainst the firm's template → output to the confirmed folder → share viacreate_collaborationoradd_folder_shared_link. [CONFIRM: DocGen template, destination folder, share method/expiration]
Legal guardrails
Box mechanics (DocGen template/tag requirements, external-sharing confirmation, AI pacing/limits/citations, metadata writes) are governed by the capability references above and box-legal-workflows. Specific to intake:
- Conflict, PEP, and sanctions clearance are firm screening + attorney/compliance calls — the agent surfaces the underlying text only and never clears them.
- Risk rating and routing/staffing are firm policy + attorney calls, never the agent's.
- Prompt Box AI to surface facts and cite the source, not to determine risk.
npx skills add https://github.com/box/box-for-ai --skill box-legal-workflows-intakeRun this in your project — your agent picks the skill up automatically.
No common issues documented yet. If you hit a problem, the repository's GitHub Issues page is the best place to look.
Licensed under MIT— you can use, modify, and redistribute it under that license's terms.
View the full license file on GitHub →