Labsco
box logo

box-legal-workflows-intake

5

by box · part of box/box-for-ai

Automate legal client intake and onboarding with Box MCP — review intake documents for completeness against firm requirements, summarize risk for attorney review, route incomplete or high-risk submissions to the right attorney, extract client and matter metadata to Box, and generate engagement letters from Box DocGen templates. Use this skill when the user mentions client intake, client onboarding, new client review, intake documents, or engagement letters.

🔌 This skill ships inside the box plugin — installing the plugin keeps everything updated together.

This is the playbook your agent receives when the skill activates — you don't need to read it to use the skill, but it's here to audit before installing.

Client Intake & Onboarding

PREREQUISITES:

  • Read box:box for Box MCP auth, tool selection, base workflows. If missing, run: npx skills add https://github.com/box/box-for-ai --skill box
  • Read box-legal-workflows for Box collaboration role definitions, Box AI usage boundaries, and reusable confirmation phrasings. If missing, run: npx skills add box/box-for-ai --skill box-legal-workflows

Do client intake in Box: inventory the intake folder, check completeness with Box AI against the firm's checklist, extract intake data into Box metadata, route via comments and collaborations, and generate the engagement letter with Box DocGen. This skill is the intake-specific recipe; the underlying Box tool mechanics live in the capability references below. The firm supplies the required-document checklist and risk criteria; conflict, PEP, and sanctions determinations run through the firm's screening system — not the agent or Box AI. Not legal advice.

Box capability references

Reach for these for tool mechanics rather than restating them here:

  • box:references/content-workflows.md — inventory the folder, metadata templates, set_file_metadata, file comments
  • box:references/ai-and-retrieval.md — completeness checks and data extraction; pacing, limits, citations
  • box:references/mcp-doc-gen.md — generate the engagement letter from a template
  • box:references/collaboration.md — tag/route the attorney and share with the client
  • box:references/mcp-search.md — find/inspect the firm's metadata template

Box metadata model

Record the intake outcome as file metadata so submissions stay searchable. Find/create the firm's template via box:references/mcp-search.md / box:references/content-workflows.md.

  • Representative fields (confirm the firm's actual set): client_name, matter_name, practice_area, matter_owner, jurisdiction, matter_value, intake_status (complete/incomplete), risk_rating, assigned_attorney, decision, decision_date.
  • Store the firm/attorney's rating and decision, not the agent's.

Tool selection

Intake taskToolNotes
Inventory submissionlist_folder_content_by_folder_idAll files in the intake folder
Check completenessai_qa_multi_filePresent/complete/valid vs. firm checklist, with citations
Extract intake dataai_extract_structured_from_fields_enhancedClient, matter, jurisdiction, value
Write metadataset_file_metadataRecord status, rating, decision, attorney
Tag attorneycreate_file_commentRoute with the factual summary
Grant accesscreate_collaborationGive the attorney access
Generate engagement lettercreate_docgen_batchOnly if the firm approves
Share with clientadd_folder_shared_link or create_collaborationConfirm audience/expiration

Workflow

  1. Inventory: list_folder_content_by_folder_id. [CONFIRM: intake folder ID]
  2. Completeness: ai_qa_multi_file — is each required doc (per the firm's checklist) present, complete, and valid, with citations? [CONFIRM: firm's required-document list]
  3. Extract intake data: ai_extract_structured_from_fields_enhanced (client_name, matter_name, practice_area, jurisdiction, matter_value, …).
  4. Surface risk indicators (facts only): ai_qa_multi_file to surface the facts the firm's criteria reference (value, jurisdiction, named parties) with citations. Do not use AI to determine conflicts, PEP status, or sanctions — pass names/entities/locations to the firm's screening system.
  5. Persist: set_file_metadata with the firm-confirmed risk_rating, intake_status, and decision.
  6. Route: create_file_comment to tag the attorney with the factual summary; create_collaboration for access. [CONFIRM: who, access level]
  7. Engagement letter (only if the firm approves): create_docgen_batch against the firm's template → output to the confirmed folder → share via create_collaboration or add_folder_shared_link. [CONFIRM: DocGen template, destination folder, share method/expiration]

Box mechanics (DocGen template/tag requirements, external-sharing confirmation, AI pacing/limits/citations, metadata writes) are governed by the capability references above and box-legal-workflows. Specific to intake:

  • Conflict, PEP, and sanctions clearance are firm screening + attorney/compliance calls — the agent surfaces the underlying text only and never clears them.
  • Risk rating and routing/staffing are firm policy + attorney calls, never the agent's.
  • Prompt Box AI to surface facts and cite the source, not to determine risk.