
checkout-credential-review
โ Officialโ 4,723by github ยท part of github/gh-aw
Review code that performs git or gh operations against repository checkouts in gh-aw, checking that the right credentials are available at the right time and that sparseness, shallowness and credential-free factors are properly considered.
This is the playbook your agent receives when the skill activates โ you don't need to read it to use the skill, but it's here to audit before installing.
Checkout Credential Review
Use this skill when reviewing or writing code in pkg/workflow/, actions/setup/js/, or compiled .lock.yml workflows that runs git, gh, or any other remote-touching operation against a repository checkout.
Background
Each entry in a workflow's checkout: block may declare its own credentials (github-token:, github-app:), and the compiler wires those into the corresponding actions/checkout step (pkg/workflow/checkout_step_generator.go). Generated checkouts always set persist-credentials: false, so the on-disk repo retains no credentials after the step finishes โ only actions/checkout's own internal token is used during the clone, and it is scrubbed in its post-step.
A separate step that wants to authenticate later must either (a) re-inject a token at command level (e.g. git -c http.extraheader=...) or (b) be passed the per-checkout token via env. The compiler does not automatically thread per-checkout github-tokens into downstream steps.
Two important contexts deliberately run with no git credentials:
- The safe-outputs MCP server and its handlers (
generate_git_bundle.cjs,generate_git_patch.cjs,create_pull_request.cjs). Errors in these paths explicitly say "the safe-outputs MCP server has no credentials for private repositories" โ fetch/push will fail for private repos. - The agent runtime after
actions/checkout. The agent prompt in actions/setup/md/safe_outputs_push_to_pr_branch.md explicitly tells the model not to attemptgit fetch,git pull,git push, or any other authenticated git operation, and to report unavailable branches rather than try to fetch them.
Review checklist
When you see a new git, gh, execFileSync('git'โฆ), or compiled run: block:
- Does it touch a remote? Local-only commands (
symbolic-ref,rev-parse,log,show,merge-base,diff,status) need no credentials. Anything infetch | pull | push | clone | ls-remote | remote (set-url|add|update)does, plus on-demand blob fetches in partial clones. - Which checkout is it operating on? If it's a cross-repo entry from
checkout:, the relevant credential is that entry'sgithub-token, not the workflow's defaultGITHUB_TOKEN. Confirm the per-entry token is actually threaded into the step's env (or refuse to do remote operations and degrade gracefully). - Which job/context emits it? Agent job and safe-outputs MCP server both run without git credentials by design. Any remote git operation there must be wrapped in
try/catch, fail soft, and surface a clear "no credentials" error rather than a raw git stderr. - Sparse / shallow / monorepo concerns. Avoid emitting steps that deepen (
git fetch --unshallow,--deepen=N) or widen (git fetch origin '+refs/heads/*') a sparse or shallow checkout of a large monorepo โ these need credentials and can pull hundreds of MB. Prefer expandingfetch:/fetch-depth:/sparse-checkout:at compile time so it happens duringactions/checkoutwith its internal token, never later. ghis REST, not git.gh api โฆuses whateverGH_TOKENis in the step's env โ it does not automatically inherit per-checkout PATs. For cross-org private repos, either thread the right token in or accept the call will 404 and handle it.
Related
- docs/src/content/docs/reference/checkout.md โ "Git Credentials After Checkout"
- docs/sparseness.md โ sparse/blobless credential lifecycle
- pkg/workflow/checkout_step_generator.go โ token wiring per checkout
- actions/setup/md/safe_outputs_push_to_pr_branch.md โ agent-facing guidance
npx skills add github/gh-aw --skill "checkout-credential-review" --full-depthRun this in your project โ your agent picks the skill up automatically.
No common issues documented yet. If you hit a problem, the repository's GitHub Issues page is the best place to look.
Licensed under MITโ you can use, modify, and redistribute it under that license's terms.
View the full license file on GitHub โ