Labsco
sanity-io logo

grill-with-docs

โ˜… 950

by sanity-io ยท part of sanity-io/next-sanity

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

๐Ÿงฐ Not standalone. This skill ships with sanity-io/next-sanity and only works together with that tool โ€” install the tool first, then add this skill.

This is the playbook your agent receives when the skill activates โ€” you don't need to read it to use the skill, but it's here to audit before installing.

Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.

Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.

If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.

Domain awareness

During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/
โ”œโ”€โ”€ CONTEXT.md
โ”œโ”€โ”€ docs/
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ adr/
โ”‚       โ”œโ”€โ”€ 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
โ”‚       โ””โ”€โ”€ 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
โ””โ”€โ”€ src/

If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:

/
โ”œโ”€โ”€ CONTEXT-MAP.md
โ”œโ”€โ”€ docs/
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ adr/                          โ† system-wide decisions
โ”œโ”€โ”€ src/
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ ordering/
โ”‚   โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ CONTEXT.md
โ”‚   โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ docs/adr/                 โ† context-specific decisions
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ billing/
โ”‚       โ”œโ”€โ”€ CONTEXT.md
โ”‚       โ””โ”€โ”€ docs/adr/

Create files lazily โ€” only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y โ€” which is it?"

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' โ€” do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible โ€” which is right?"

Update CONTEXT.md inline

When a term is resolved, update CONTEXT.md right there. Don't batch these up โ€” capture them as they happen. Use the format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.

CONTEXT.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat CONTEXT.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

  1. Hard to reverse โ€” the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
  2. Surprising without context โ€” a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
  3. The result of a real trade-off โ€” there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.