
sentry-pr-code-review
✓ Official★ 232by sentry · part of getsentry/sentry-for-ai
Review a project's PRs to check for issues detected in code review by Seer Bug Prediction. Use when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR…
Review a project's PRs to check for issues detected in code review by Seer Bug Prediction. Use when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR…
Inspect the full instructions your agent will receiveExpandCollapse
This is the exact playbook injected into your agent when the skill activates — shown here so you can audit it before installing. You don't need to read it to use the skill.
by sentry
Review a project's PRs to check for issues detected in code review by Seer Bug Prediction. Use when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR…
npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-for-claude --skill sentry-pr-code-review
Download ZIPGitHub232
All Skills > Workflow > PR Code Review
Sentry Code Review
Review and fix issues identified by Seer (by Sentry) in GitHub PR comments.
Invoke This Skill When
-
User asks to "review Sentry comments" or "fix Sentry issues" on a PR
-
User shares a PR URL/number and mentions Sentry or Seer feedback
-
User asks to "address Sentry review" or "resolve Sentry findings"
-
User wants to find PRs with unresolved Sentry comments
Phase 1: Fetch Seer Comments
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments --paginate \
--jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "seer-by-sentry[bot]") | {file: .path, line: .line, body: .body}'
The bot login is seer-by-sentry[bot] — not sentry[bot] or sentry-io[bot].
If no PR number is given, find recent PRs with Seer comments:
gh pr list --state open --json number,title --limit 20 | \
jq -r '.[].number' | while read pr; do
count=$(gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/$pr/comments" --paginate \
--jq '[.[] | select(.user.login == "seer-by-sentry[bot]")] | length')
[ "$count" -gt 0 ] && echo "PR #$pr: $count Seer comments"
done
Phase 2: Parse Each Comment
Extract from the markdown body:
-
Bug description: Line starting with
**Bug:** -
Severity/Confidence: In
<sub>Severity: X | Confidence: X.XX</sub> -
Analysis: Inside
<summary>🔍 <b>Detailed Analysis</b></summary>block -
Suggested Fix: Inside
<summary>💡 <b>Suggested Fix</b></summary>block -
AI Prompt: Inside
<summary>🤖 <b>Prompt for AI Agent</b></summary>block
Phase 3: Verify & Fix
For each issue:
-
Read the file at the specified line
-
Confirm issue still exists in current code (not already fixed in a later commit)
-
Review surrounding code to assess if it's an actual issue or false positive
-
Implement fix (use suggested fix as starting point, or write your own)
-
Consider edge cases and regression risk
Phase 4: Summarize and Report Results
## Seer Review: PR #[number]
### Resolved
| File:Line | Issue | Severity | Fix Applied |
|-----------|-------|----------|-------------|
| path:123 | desc | HIGH | what done |
### Skipped (false positive or already fixed)
| File:Line | Issue | Reason |
|-----------|-------|--------|
**Summary:** X resolved, Y skipped
Seer Review Triggers
Trigger When
PR set to "Ready for Review" Automatic error prediction
Commit pushed while PR is ready Re-runs prediction
@sentry review comment Manual trigger for full review + suggestions
Draft PR Skipped — no review until marked ready
npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-for-ai --skill sentry-pr-code-reviewRun this in your project — your agent picks the skill up automatically.
Prerequisites
-
ghCLI installed and authenticated -
Repository has the Seer by Sentry GitHub App installed
Important: The comment format parsed below is based on Seer's current output. This is not an API contract and may change. Always verify the actual comment structure.
Troubleshooting
Issue Solution
No Seer comments found Verify the Seer GitHub App is installed on the repo
Bot name mismatch The login is seer-by-sentry[bot], not sentry[bot]
Comments not appearing on new PRs PR must be "Ready for Review" (not draft)
gh api returns partial results Ensure --paginate flag is included
Common Issue Types
Category Examples Type Safety Missing null checks, unsafe type assertions Error Handling Swallowed errors, missing boundaries Validation Permissive inputs, missing sanitization Config Missing env vars, incorrect paths