Governance tooling usually amounts to logging what already happened. Here the order is written into the API: evaluate whether the action is admissible, then commit it with its outcome — and commit_action's own description says it must follow an evaluation. That makes the audit ledger meaningful rather than decorative. check_claim is the other genuinely useful one: asking whether a new statement contradicts what is on record is the check an agent never performs on itself.
Exogram's endpoint, which listed seven tools to our probe as exogram 2.1.2. Two halves: a vault of verified facts, and a governance layer that judges proposed actions and records what was done.
- search_vault — semantic search over verified facts, with a minimum confidence threshold
- check_claim — whether a claim conflicts with what is already on record, and which facts bear on it
- store_record — commit a fact; it is embedded, encrypted and PII-scrubbed on the way in
- evaluate_action — whether a proposed action is admissible under the user's governance policy
- commit_action — record the action and its outcome to a tamper-proof audit ledger, after evaluation
- get_action_history and get_ledger_stats — the ledger, and the vault's size and quality
A bearer key beginning exo_prod_ per the documentation, though the handshake and listing answered without one. Pro is $29/month for one seat and up to three monitored agents; Team is $99 flat for five seats, 25 agents and SOC2 compliance logs.
Paste a URL with a key — add the endpoint to your client