Summary
The same page can be checked alone, against a rival, or inside a list, without changing tools or vocabulary.
compare_pages and batch_check are the reason to reach for this rather than a single-URL checker — one call sets a page beside a competitor, or an entire list into one summary table. The tools also state their own depth instead of leaving you to discover it: check_seo is the detailed pass and returns improvement suggestions, while check_accessibility is described as basic and gives colour contrast hints rather than measured ratios.
What it is
A URL auditing server: one page, two pages compared, or a batch of them, checked for SEO, accessibility, performance and broken links.
What you get
- check_website, a health check covering SEO, performance, security and accessibility for a URL.
- check_seo, reporting title, meta description, headings, keywords and Open Graph tags with improvement suggestions.
- check_accessibility, covering alt texts, ARIA labels, heading hierarchy, colour contrast hints and form labels.
- find_broken_links, which crawls a page and checks its links for 404s, timeouts and redirects, capped by max_links.
- compare_pages for two URLs side by side, and batch_check for a list of URLs returned as a summary table.
Requirements
Nothing to supply — no account, no key. URLs the server can reach: every tool takes a URL rather than a file, a repository or a login.
Setup effort
One command — npx webcheck-mcp